Technology Solutions & Practices Shared Interest Group

  • 1.  Hump Day: breaking up the week with something new

    Posted 2 days ago
      |   view attached

    Starting something new for Wednesdays: each week I'll try something out, a tool, a feature, a workflow tweak, whatever's actually worth a look, build something real with it, and share the demo here. No theory, no "AI is changing everything" takes, just: here's what I tried, here's what I made, here's what it took.

    First up: Google's NotebookLM. I answered three questions about how I actually use AI day to day, fed those answers in, and had it generate a short podcast, two AI hosts discussing my answers back to me like a real interview segment.

    Link to Podcast

    Getting started took a couple of minutes. I told it to take some creative liberties, so I'm expecting it ran with that. One thing that did catch me off guard: the finished podcast came out to 21 minutes, from maybe two paragraphs of actual input.

    What have you been curious about but haven't had time to try? Drop it below, might be next week's Hump Day.



    ------------------------------
    Daniel Harley CMA,CSCA
    Director/Manager
    Newtown PA
    https://www.linkedin.com/in/danieljharley/
    ------------------------------


  • 2.  RE: Hump Day: breaking up the week with something new

    Posted 2 days ago
    Edited by Daniel Harley 2 days ago

    This is pretty cool. I do career coaching on the side. I'm very minor. I only have a couple of clients, but I enjoy doing it, and I enjoy seeing people grow and helping them. It's been a really rewarding experience. One of my clients is a bit of a non-traditional learner, and we've been trying to figure out how to make the boring textbook content more engaging. We had run through a couple of experiments, and I said, "Let me explain it to you and tell me how that resonates with you." We used some real-life examples, and we talked. I discussed it for a second, and it certainly wasn't perfect. There were a lot of improvements that I needed to make in my delivery to make it resonate with my client. It was clear that changing the learning modality, whether it be subtle or dramatic, can make such a huge difference. I'm really curious about what this technology can bring to bear on topics that are maybe a little dry or for people to just learn differently. I don't know. It significantly piqued my interest. 

    What if I was able to load some dry content? They created a podcast about it. I then said, "Make it shorter because I don't like listening to super long podcasts."
     
    One of the things that I discovered with AI was that I can use Wispr, and I could talk while I walked and I could capture my thoughts. I thought that was amazing. I love podcasts because I can listen to them and learn something as I'm going, but rarely am I able to learn exactly what I want because I can't curate and create the podcast myself. If I did do that, I wouldn't learn anything because I would have designed the podcast, which is way more effort than actually listening to it. 
    So, as I'm thinking about this now, the possibilities just keep growing. I think that's one of the challenges with AI and technology, especially today: the path from idea to execution has shortened so dramatically that there's really no reason to not do it, to not try, to not experiment. And of course, that leads to all sorts of different problems because I have more stuff hanging half open right now than I've had in quite some time. At the same time, I'm closing more real loops today: more real physical activities, more real mental exercise, more real work tasks, more real problems are being solved, but I've got a lot more open. My rate of closure probably hasn't improved, but the sheer number of things that I'm closing certainly has, and that's been an interesting journey that maybe I'll get into another time. 



    ------------------------------
    Daniel Harley CMA,CSCA
    Director/Manager
    Newtown PA
    https://www.linkedin.com/in/danieljharley/
    ------------------------------



  • 3.  RE: Hump Day: breaking up the week with something new

    Posted 2 days ago

    This is an interesting experiment, Daniel. The learning angle is probably what caught my attention most.

    I manage finance operations teams, and one thing I've been experimenting with is how we can move people from simply knowing accounting to actually understanding the process around it. For example, it is relatively easy to teach someone how to do a bank reconciliation or pass an entry. It is much harder to teach them why something looks wrong, what questions they should ask, and how that eventually flows through to the financial statements.

    That's where I think changing the learning modality with AI could become really useful. Take the same dry accounting content and turn it into a podcast, a client scenario, a case discussion, or even have AI play the role of a controller questioning your analysis. Suddenly the learner has to think rather than just remember.

    We've also been experimenting with AI and automation in actual finance operations - reconciliations, reporting, workflow improvements, etc. What I'm finding interesting is that the value isn't always in automating the entire process. Sometimes just giving an accountant a different way to investigate or think through a problem makes a meaningful difference.

    I also really relate to your point about the path from idea to execution becoming so short. I find myself trying things now that I probably would have just added to an "ideas for later" list a couple of years ago.

    But I think that creates another challenge: starting things is becoming incredibly cheap. Deciding which experiments are worth continuing, scaling and actually closing out may become the harder skill.

    I haven't played around enough with NotebookLM yet, but this definitely gives me a reason to try it. I might actually start with some dry finance material and see what it can do with it.



    ------------------------------
    Joepaul Kalathil John CMA
    Director/Manager
    Ernakulam
    India
    ------------------------------



  • 4.  RE: Hump Day: breaking up the week with something new

    Posted 2 days ago

    Joepaul,


    Your observations are pretty consistent with my own. I've also done a lot of automation where it's not 100% automated, but mostly automated, and the challenge is usually at the handoff points: getting the information in, or sending it to someone else. I call these the first and final miles. The "first mile" is usually solvable with Excel, Power Query, and the usual tools. The "final mile," things like sending an email that integrates the output correctly, is harder, partly because of restrictions on automated sending, and partly because it's a less structured, more non-deterministic problem. AI has real potential in both of those spots.

    I really like the idea of using this with your finance teams. It's easier now to start with a draft, run it through a company-controlled or enterprise LLM to anonymize it, then move it into NotebookLM for flash cards, podcasts, whatever fits. The client scenarios are especially interesting to me, since it's about as close as you can get to a role play without actually doing one.

    You're right that the cost to try something is very low now. One thing I've been working on is not creating as many open loops. I'm not great at it on the AI side, but I do clear out my chats periodically: things move to a someday/maybe pile, or get deleted if I'm not going to pursue them. It can feel overwhelming to have that many ideas with potential just sitting there.

    I also spent time today on Claude Cowork and Claude Code, something I'd been wanting to try for a while. I didn't get far, an attempt to automate a couple of report pulls didn't work in either tool, but it did work through Claude for Chrome directly, which both of those tools turned out to rely on anyway. Rather than fully automating it, I ended up just being able to paste a prompt in, which sounds small but removes the friction of stopping what I'm doing, logging in, and downloading things manually. That friction was the actual reason I wasn't doing it as often as I wanted to. Good enough progress for one afternoon (it took about three hours), but it reinforced something I already knew: even the simple stuff takes real time before you get proficient at it.



    ------------------------------
    Daniel Harley CMA,CSCA
    Director/Manager
    Newtown PA
    https://www.linkedin.com/in/danieljharley/
    ------------------------------